Guide for reviewing articles.

 

Return a TWO page (typed) summary/review.

Suggested outline:

• Leading Paragraph
  
  Brief description of main theme/goal of the paper and its relevance to science and/or industry. Make the reader become interested and motivate further reading with a thumbnail description of main results.
  
  For instance: "In this paper, the author(s) use geometrical techniques to explore the behavior of the logistic map. In particular, they show ...
  
  
• Technical Section
  
  Introduce mathematical models, if any. Briefly describe principal terms and summarize results of the analysis. If appropriate, break down the summary by cases, according to the layout of the paper.
  
  
• Final Comments
  
  Provide an objective overall evaluation of the paper. Constructive negative criticisms are valid, but not subjective remarks. What makes this paper interesting or bad from the scientific point of view?
  
  For instance, "...Although the authors make a significant effort in presenting graphical tools for the analysis of the model, the results that they provide are not novel ...